comment 0

Diploma 2017 in the ADBK Munich (5/5): Emi Fukuda

Diploma 2017 in the ADBK Munich (5/5): Emi Fukuda

“If I create from the heart, nearly everything works, if from the head, almost nothing.” – Marc Chagall

Emi Fukuda and I have a similar approach to our creative processes. Our work doesn’t have its starting point with a rational idea we want to express or a defined statement that we want to make. Emi and I are “emotional makers”. We let our pieces evolve in an intuitive process, which embraces spontaneity and experimental play. This is just how creating comes most naturally to us. Emi wrote in her artist statement: “I like to think that my works are not made, but in a sense, they grow into existence.” Having found the perfect word to embody this “organic” way of creating, Emi titled her diploma show Flow.

The difficulties this way of creating present to me is that it is much harder to talk about emotional rather than rational and intellectual processes. How do you talk about things that came from a place within you, that you yourself might not really understand? Which leads me to the question: Does an artist have to talk and write about her/his work?

In general, I would say that it is completely ok if an artist does not talk and write about his/her work, no matter for what reasons. The work itself should do most of the talking anyhow in my point of view. But: I realized that not writing and talking about the work is limiting an artist´s possibilities to promote the work significantly. In the past, I avoided circumstances which required words of mine about my work. But after a while, there was just no way around it anymore. The more I managed to get my work out there, the more often it was requested that I talk and write about it. The truth is that being an artist is not only about creating anymore, artists today have to be multitalented and super-creative on many levels. In our digitised, globalised world, artists have to be some kind of all-round performers, and if you have a way with words, that is definitely an ability that will prove most helpful on countless occasions.

Unfortunately, the ambition to capture the audience sometimes happens at the expense of the artists’ authenticity. On several occasions, it occurred to me that I was sitting in an artist talk, and the artist took away the magic of the work for me by trying too hard: a sophisticated, intellectual approach that seemed forced, a cascade of historic references or gimmicky notions…. Just to make the point that words don’t necessarily help the work.

So, if you really don’t want or can’t write and talk about your work, why not let somebody else do it for you? This will happen sooner or later anyhow by art historians, journalists, curators, gallery owners etc. I gained good and not so good experiences with that. In the best case the writer has the knowledge, the imagination and the sensitivity to write something that is doing justice to the artworks. Some people wrote texts about my work, which really were great, much better than anything I could have ever written. Some planted misguiding conclusions, which were picked up by others and developed further. One interview with a Dutch guy went so totally the wrong way that in the end I asked him to not publish anything. I felt that he completely misunderstood my work and that this interview would be only counterproductive.

When I began to understand that there was no way for me of not writing and talking about my work, I started to put my work and myself (as an artist) under the looking glass. Which kind of words beside technical details could I find to make my work more approachable? What could increase rather than diminish the expression of my pieces, but still keep my authenticity as an “emotional maker”? I am still looking for answers while I am trying out different approaches.
For the catalogue of the exhibition, Where Blue Hides After Dark in Sienna Gallery, I wrote a kind fairy tale about the colour Blue, which derived from a dream I had. I felt that worked really well. Lately, I have been writing short stories and a couple of song lyrics in relation to my work. All this might not explain the work in the common sense, but it adds another layer, offers another angle. The good thing was that the more I was trying to find solutions for this lack of words, the more I really did understand my work and working process. I figured out that even though I work mainly through my emotions, there are some rational aspects about it nevertheless. And this made it easier for me to write and talk about my pieces in a theoretic way of course. For the “emotional maker”, this process might take more time, but it is surely worth the effort. After all, working spontaneously, intuitively and through your emotions is also just a concept, which can be pinned down.

So, finally back to Emi’s diploma show (sorry, Emi…). Emi normally prefers not to talk or write about her work, but for this blogpost, Emi agreed to put some aspects of her work into words.

Carina: Why don’t you like to talk about your work?

Emi: I want to ignore everything to do with a concept. Like a child, I emphasize the joyful and playful experiment. I want to be almost out of control, touch the primitive part of me… creation should be free! I want people to be totally open about it when they see my work and maybe find a similarly and free playful approach to it. Curiosity is the most important thing when you make or look at art.

Carina: Tell me a bit more about the pieces that you displayed in your diploma show titled Flow.

Emi: Casting is an important process for me now, and for the diploma show, I focused on the casting of aluminum. I made countless experiments, most of which did not work out. I took much time and risk for that. First, I used wax to create the forms and then built moulds with plaster. Then the metal is cast. I love the process of casting, because it is pure. The metal is poured and structured in the moment. It then emerges in a new shape… like a life itself.

Carina: From where do you get the ideas for your shapes? What inspires you?

Emi: The ideas for my work always come from memories, from something I experienced, a moment of its own life. For example, the ring titled Fragile is about a hurtful memory. I created an organic shape from transparent glass and cracked it to express the feeling of fragility. It was my first attempt in casting glass. I feel there is a lot of potential in this technique for me.

The idea for the necklace Portrait came from a portrait picture of mine. While I was looking at it, I recalled some experiences in my life, positively and negatively. Some chapters of my life. Then I created the necklace with these feelings and memories lingering. I built the shape of it with several wax blocks dynamically to express the accumulation of life experience.

In the brooch titled Flying to… I wanted to visualize the theme of changing and movement. This piece was formed beginning from the ground, grew and then morphed into butterfly-like creatures. The swarm of butterflies imply harmony, movement and the flow of time in space. Then they move to a new world of freedom and destiny. The base of the piece was formed in layers like sediment. It is like a mediator who connects the wearer to society and to the world.

Carina: You are also drawing a lot and you showed one of your drawings in your diploma show. Is drawing a fixed part of your creating process?

Emi: Yes. It is a very important part of my work. I think with the drawings I express another angle of my work, similar to what you do with your songs. My ideas come always from my daily life, and then I draw quickly. I draw normally just some simple sketches with pencil and water colour. A simple process can be more specific and stronger. I feel water colour best suits the way to connect to my jewellery pieces. Drawing with water seems like a pure process to me, similar to the pouring of metal.

Carina: What are your plans for the future?

Emi: I am in Japan now and will probably stay for a year or so. Then I will choose the best place where I should be. I would like to be here in Japan to absorb or re-understand my own culture to develop my work further. I was away for over 10 years and so many things have changed. It shocks me, but it is also nice to experience it.

Carina: Thanks, Emi!

Sool Park wrote a sensitive text for Emi, which she handed out in her diploma show. It starts like this: “Everything flows- even those things, which seem hard and immobile. So, what happens when the hard is flowing? Does it lose its hardness? Or is it rather showing its inner life, which never was hard?”

Emi Fukuda (born in 1980 in Osaka, Japan) graduated in 2013 from the Osaka University of Arts, Japan, as a Bachelor of Fine Arts. From 2007 until 2009, she studied at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia, in the gold-and silversmithing department and then from 2012 -2017 at the Academy of Fine Arts Munich, Germany, in the jewellery department.

Images:
1 Emi Fukuda: Invitation card for diploma show Flow, Photo: Emi Fukuda
2 Emi Fukuda: Diploma show Flow, Munich, 2017; Photo: Masayuki Nagata
3 Emi Fukuda: Diploma show Flow, Munich, 2017; Photo: Carina Shoshtary
4 Emi Fukuda: Diploma show Flow, Munich, 2017; Photo: Carina Shoshtary
5 Emi Fukuda: Portrait, Necklace, 2016; Aluminium, string; 6,5 cm x 8,5cm x 1,5 cm; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
6 Emi Fukuda: Flying to…, Brooch, 2016; Aluminium, steel wire; 7,0 cm x 5,5 cm x 3,5 cm; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
7 Emi Fukuda: Fragile, Ring, 2016; Aluminium, glass; 3,0 cm x 3,5 cm x 3,0 cm; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
8 Emi Fukuda: Diploma show Flow, Munich, 2017; Photo: Masayuki Nagata
9 Emi Fukuda: Diploma show Flow, Munich, 2017; Photo: Carina Shoshtary

comment 0

Diploma 2017 in the ADBK Munich (4/5): Jing Yang

I really have a lot of respect for people, who leave their country to study far away from home. It must be very hard in the beginning. When Jing Yang came from China to Germany to study in the Munich Jewellery Class, she must have suffered from a real cultural shock. Without either German nor much English to communicate, I remember her struggling to find her way with her jewellery work and with life in Germany in general. But Jing is made of much sturdier stuff than her petite figure would suggest. During this time, I was teaching German classes to classmates and when Jing joined us, she could already speak German pretty well, which was astonishing seeing that she’d never visited any German classes before. She had been teaching herself.
Jing also developed her language as a contemporary jewellery artist quite fast. After some teething problems, (which we’d all been confronted with) she created a stunning series of necklaces titled Ich bin keine Vase (“I am not a vase”), which are composed of several loose stringed brass parts. If you staple the geometrical elements on top of each other, you will get a classical shape of a vase. This work knocked my socks off when I first saw it in Jing´s solo show during the Munich Jewellery Week 2015.

Jing explained to me during our interview in her diploma show: “Art Jewellery or hollowware belongs to the applied arts, the pieces normally ought to have a function. I used the shape of a vase, but took away its original functioning. The vase became something new. It became jewellery. The other meaning comes from China: If you say in China that a woman or a man is like a vase, it means that he or she is pretty from the outside, but empty from the inside, just like a hollow decorative item. So, by wearing one of these necklaces, the wearer declares that he/she has something to say.”

In her diploma show, Jing had her own room to exhibit necklaces on the walls and a huge “version” of her divided vase shapes made of clay, which were presented in the center of the room.

Carina: How do you make these jewellery pieces? Do you create the entire vase shape at first and then cut it apart?

Jing: No, they are made differently. First, I draw shapes of vases I find beautiful. Many people think I am using traditional Chinese vase shapes, but it is really my own shapes that I like. Then I cut the drawing apart into segments and calculate the individual parts mathematically to build them on paper first. Often, I then have to adapt the shape if I cannot solve the calculations. The segments of the vase are then built separately in brass.

Carina: So actually, the vase only exists in your mind and on the paper, but never in the proper material…

Jing: Yes. This is important for me, there never was an actual vase. There is the image of a vase, when you stack the segments on top of each other. But when you wear it, the vase shape falls apart into new ever-changing forms. You cannot wear the vase around your neck as a jewellery piece.

Carina: So, tell me a bit about the sculpture you made from clay?

Jing: There is certainly a strong connection to the jewellery series, because you could again build a vase from these parts. If you stapled all the pieces on top of each other, you would get a 1.90 m high sculpture, so approximately man high. For me, there is also a connection to the body, because the process of making these clay pieces was physically hard work. I needed a lot of help. The clay pieces are very heavy, and I cannot lift them by myself. I think all the Chinese students from the Academy were helping me with this project and the caretaker of the Academy knows me much better now than he would like to I think.

Carina: Did you ever build the vase from these parts?

Jing: Yes, I did. But I see the whole piece more like an invitation to build different shapes from it. Like with the jewellery, there is no definite shape for me.

Carina: And how did you make the segments for this piece?

Jing: For the jewellery, I calculated the flat projections, which were then folded into a three-dimensional geometrical shape. For the clay segments, I had to make the calculations already for 3- D pieces. It was quite complicated.

Carina: Do you enjoy mathematics?

Jing: Yes, a lot. I can really focus when I am calculating mathematical formulas. Everybody in the studio already knows that it is better not to disturb me, when I am doing mathematics.

Carina: So, congratulations on finishing your studies! What are your plans for the future now?
Jing: I want to continue working in Munich at least for a few more years now, but I think earlier or later, I want to go back to China.

Carina: I know that you were doing performance and video art before your studies in Munich. Now you made your first sculpture. Will you continue working in different media?

Jing: Yes, I have been focusing on making art jewellery now for several years, but in the future, I want to be open to work in other media too. I want to work in the media which best fits the ideas I’d like to implement.

Carina: Thank you, Jing.

Jing Yang (born 1987 in Hunan, China) received her BA of Fine Arts from the Xiamen University, China, in 2010. She then studied at the Academy of Fine Arts Munich in the jewellery class from 2010-2017 under Prof. Otto Künzli and Prof. Karen Pontoppidan.

Images:
1 Jing Yang: Invitation card for diploma show Keine Vase, Photo: Jing Yang
2 Jing Yang: Untitled, Necklace; Brass, string; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
3 Jing Yang: Untitled, Necklace; Brass, string; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
4 Jing Yang: Diploma show Keine Vase, Munich, 2017; Photo: Carina Shoshtary
5 Jing Yang: Untitled, Necklace; Brass, string; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
6/7/8 Jing Yang: Diploma show Keine Vase, Munich, 2017; Photo: Carina Shoshtary
9 Jing Yang: Untitled, Necklace; Brass, string; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi

comment 0

A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE

A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE

 

It was that week of the year again…
The only week in the year when I iron my clothes and apply lipstick every morning. The week when I hardly get any sleep at night, experience consistent dehydration in the afternoons and become hoarse to speechless over the course of the day. The week when even I (who rarely ever drinks a drop of alcohol) am longing for a drink every evening. The week when Munich is invaded by the community of the contemporary jewellery world, without the people of Munich even noticing it.
The week before last was Munich Jewellery Week 2017. What a harmless title for this jam-packed abundance of everything to do with contemporary jewellery. I think Munich Jewellery War would be as appropriate, because you easily get the feeling that you need to fight your way through the week in order to simply persevere, no matter if you came to see or show or both. Or Munich Jewellery Walk, as there is definitely a lot of walking involved during these days. From one exhibition, artist talk, party event to the next all day, several days... Or Munich Jewellery Wow, because it is altogether an overwhelming experience, stimulating and exhausting simultaneously.

Last year I had only started writing the KARMA CHROMA- blog and gone into the MJW with the expectation of writing a rich synopsis of all I saw and heard, but the task was just too big for me. In the end, I wrote two articles about two artists whose shows I had visited during the week. Given that around 80 jewellery exhibitions had been on show and I had seen probably half of them, that is a bit meager of course, but I think I prefer it that way. This year, I had an exhibition with three colleagues myself and did not manage to see too much unfortunately. So, this year I will merely write about our project during the MJW 2017.

Our exhibition with the curious title “A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE” showed a large number of the latest jewellery pieces and artworks of other media of Attai Chen, Mielle Harvey, Barbara Schrobenhauser and me in the two rooms of the “Verein für Originalradierung München” (an association, which usually is specialized in showing etching art). Barbara, Attai and I studied together almost the whole time in the Munich jewellery class at the ADBK and have been very good friends and colleagues ever since with a lively exchange. Attai Chen and I have been a couple for the last nine years, during which our work has been profoundly influenced and inspired by each other. Mielle is from an earlier generation of Künzli graduates, though I have felt connected with her work for a long time as she was one of my idols when I began to explore art jewellery. She is also a lovely person, so it was both an honour and a pleasure to make this exhibition project with her. The four of us felt that our work was strongly connected in some ways, but was also different enough to create an interesting diverse exhibition together. It wasn’t a curated exhibition though, so we needed to elaborate a concept for our show.

An extract of our exhibition text reads:

“The exhibition, ‘A BARBARIAN, A TITLE & A MIRACLE’ is designed like a collage, created from the collision of diverging and intersecting nuggets of meaning. A group show is a kind of assemblage of different artistic positions, joined temporarily to create a new whole. To this end, we take on the exhibition like a game of scrabble, juxtaposing our individual bodies of work to expose new meanings.”

The idea of making a collage, which created new perspectives and meanings for our work, was the core of the concept when we developed the title, the invitation card and the presentation of the work. For our strange title, we wrote down our four first names on paper, cut the letters apart and played a scrabble game with them until we found a sequence of words, we liked. In the process, many even odder titles came up, but we liked “A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE” the best. It could be the title of a poetic story or the beginning of a joke...

For the presentation of the work, we built four long tables assembled from many boards of different colour, material and thickness. We collected pieces of old furniture from different eras and other disregarded boards for several months to have enough interesting material at hand. We all liked this idea also for ecological reasons. It was agreed that in the past we’d experienced that too much waste is created for exhibitions which are only on display for a few days, so we wanted to try to produce as little new waste as possible for this project.
Building the tables went astonishingly fast, but laying out the jewellery pieces took more time than anticipated. For two full days, we were trying different variations. We felt that finding the right way to place the pieces on the patchwork tables was the key to making the show work. The “new nuggets of meaning” became our motto and a running joke during this phase. It was important for us to not only lay pieces next to each other by chance, but to choose them very carefully in order to find interesting partners and relevant groups. In the end, I think we succeeded very well. One visitor even liked one particular “new nugget of meaning” so much, she said, that the two pieces belonged to each other and purchased them together.

Attai Chen (born 1979 in Jerusalem, Israel) showed his new paper jewellery series Matter of Perspective, which addresses the theme of multiple perspectives and how we perceive our surroundings. The explosive disorder of his previous paper series is now bundled and tamed in oval shapes. The way he cuts the paper has also changed quite a bit. Attai is building countless little flat projections of cardboard, which he merges into complex abstract views. Even though Attai was mainly inspired by the Pre-Renaissance perception of space and perspective, for me they are like peepholes to futuristic apocalyptic cityscapes. The backs of the pieces are made with an intricate technique of layering and sanding graphite dust to smooth and slightly shiny surfaces.

Barbara Schrobenhauser (born 1979 in Traunstein, Germany) also exhibited totally new works: There were three freshly finished brooches, where Barbara explored the possibilities of creating a three-dimensional shape only by knotting a string. Like often with Barbara’s pieces, the viewer can only fully understand her works by touching them and so this exhibition was a great opportunity to do so. Barbara showed also several pendants and necklaces made of string and wooden handles. The strings were woven together elaborately to close the handles’ open shape and were hung into each other like the links of a chain. What I enjoyed about these pieces was the playful moment when people tried them on. Even though Barbara had actually planned them to be worn in a particular way, the visitors found different ways to wear them.

Mielle Harvey (born in 1971 in New York, USA), presented pendants, necklaces and brooches from two series: Silver Scenes and Moments of Sky. The delicate pieces, which she created in versatile techniques like painting, drawing and patinating silver, appear like windows that capture a glimpse of a fleeting moment. A passing butterfly or bird, a fluffy cloud or a view of a beautiful landscape, they all represent precious moments, which we too often overlook. I especially fell in love with one piece titled Cameo III, which was made by the lost wax casting technique. It shows a detail of a birch tree forest in an oval frame. At least this is my interpretation of this pendant, because it is almost abstract.

And I (Carina Shoshtary, born 1979 in Augsburg, Germany), showed most of my new pieces from the last 1 ½ years, which included necklaces, brooches and earrings. My idea was to create ceremonial jewellery for a fictitious tribe of hunter gatherers. The most characteristic material is still the graffiti paint, but now involves other found materials into my work, e.g. driftwood, seeds and shells etc. My colour emphasis shifted towards the colour red, which is truly fascinating for me at the moment. Associations to the body are always present. Some pieces contain shapes with bright red openings which invite the viewer to have a look inside the “organism”. One lady said that the pieces appear very seductive for her, but that there is also something unsettling about them. I liked that; it’s exactly the kind of ambivalence that I am looking for.

In our second smaller room, the four of us each exhibited other artworks.
Attai presented one of his new paper wall sculptures, which are a big replica of the brooches of his Compounding Fractions -series. A lot of people who knew his jewellery were amazed at how well he transported the details and the overall impression of the jewellery into a much bigger scale.
Barbara had four of her paper vessels in the second room. The pieces, which are created with incredibly complicated and time-intense techniques, were quite astonishing for the visitors, as many thought at first that they were made of stone and marble. Also, here people needed to touch and feel the paper to comprehend the objects.

Mielle, who is never working on a theme only in the medium of jewellery, but is always simultaneously drawing and painting, showed a couple of drawings on a big wall. The themes of her jewellery pieces were resumed here and gave people a wider insight into her creative work.
I showed four large-scale photographs of my beautiful sister in law wearing my jewellery pieces. The photographs are part of my second collaboration with Munich based photographer, Laurens Grigoleit, who in my eyes is a master of light. Some people even asked me if they were painted images. I will surely write more about this collaboration on the blog soon.

Altogether we were really happy with our exhibition. We want to thank everybody who came during this week, we really met many wonderful people! We also want to thank the "Radierverein" to rent us their beautiful rooms for this week!

Our special thanks goes to Katrin Eitner and the “Förderverein zum Aufbau einer Juliane Noack Künstlerförderung” for supporting this exhibition with a grant of 700 €. Our project was the second they funded, but there are more to come. So please follow up the news on their website!

And finally, we want to thank Tereza Novotna, who a few months ago started an internship with Attai and since then has become an irreplaceable force in many ways for all of us (e.g. when none of us had the energy anymore, she jumped in and made us this incredibly clever and handsome exhibition plan with the info about all the pieces): You are amazing, Tereza!!! Ty jsi nejlepší! Milujeme tě a rozhodně bychom tě adoptovali, kdyby nám to tvoje rodiče dovolili. Objímáme tě.

Images:
1Tereza Novotna: Exhibition plan for A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE
2/3 Building of the exhibition A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE, Photos: Carina Shoshtary/ Attai Chen
4-10 A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE, Munich, 2017; Photos: Carina Shoshtary
11 Attai Chen: Untitled; Necklace, 2017; Paper, paint, silver, wood, graphite; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
12 Barbara Schrobenhauser:  Confused and Concentrated; Brooch. 2017; Cotton, string, stainless steel; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
13 Barbara Schrobenhauser:  Vom Tragen und Halten II; Neckpiece2017; Wooden handels, woven string; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
14 Mielle Harvey: Moments of Sky Necklace; Necklace, 2016; Sterling silver, oil paint, silk cord; Photo: Mielle Harvey
15 Mielle Harvey: Cameo I, Pendant, 2017; Lost wax cast sterling silver, patina, oil paint, silk cord; Photo: Mielle Harvey
16 Carina Shoshtary: Over the Rainbow; Necklace, 2016; Graffiti, silver; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
17 Carina Shoshtary: Carnivore 3; Necklace, 2017; Graffiti, glass, silver; Photo: Mirei Takeuchi
18-24 A BARBARIAN, A TITLE, & A MIRACLE, Munich, 2017; Photos: Carina Shoshtary, Tereza Novotna